China Safety Science Journal ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 1-11.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.001

• Safety science theory and safety system science •     Next Articles

From passive safety to active safety: discussion on core logic of production safety governance

LAN Qi1, LIU Sanjiang2, REN Chongbao3, TAN Mingbo1   

  1. 1 Institute of Development Strategy, China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Beijing 100029,China;
    2 China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute,Beijing 100029,China;
    3 School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing),Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2020-07-31 Revised:2020-09-13 Online:2020-10-28 Published:2021-07-15

Abstract: In order to explore main contradiction and future development directions of production safety governance, development trend from passive safety to active safety was systematically discussed and theories of safety governance were further enriched and improved. Firstly, through literature analysis and practice research methods, economy, technology, management, and culture were extracted as basic, supporting, ensuring and leading influencing factors of safety governance. Secondly, a system dynamics model was established and influencing mechanism of these factors was revealed. Then, according to contradiction and development theory based on historical materialism and materialist dialectics, it was put forward that the major contradiction in China's future-oriented safety governance lied in that between safety and culture. Finally, development framework of safety governance was designed based on contradiction analysis. The results show that future production safety governance should focus on aspects of economy, technology, management and culture, among which culture will be core logic to achieve transformation of passive safety to active safety.

Key words: passive safety, active safety, production safety governance, main contradictions, safety culture

CLC Number: